Tube4vids logo

Your daily adult tube feed all in one place!

Trying to read your dog's mood? You may be barking up the wrong tree as researchers find man's best friend lost communication skills since being domesticated

PUBLISHED
UPDATED
VIEWS

Most dog owners will insist they can tell what their pooch is thinking from their face alone.

But man's best friend used to be even more expressive, according to a study.

Researchers have discovered that the domestication process has resulted in the loss of some communication abilities in today's dogs compared to their wolf ancestors.

The team, from Durham University, used a Dog Facial Action Coding System to analyse video recordings of captive wolves and domestic dogs.

This was both during spontaneous social interactions and reactions to external stimuli, for example a squeaky toy.

Puppy dog eyes: Man's best friend used to be more expressive, according to a new study from Durham University

Puppy dog eyes: Man's best friend used to be more expressive, according to a new study from Durham University

Researchers identified nine distinct emotional states that could be predicted based on wolves' facial movements with 71 per cent accuracy. However, the accuracy dropped to only 65 per cent for domestic dogs across different breeds

Researchers identified nine distinct emotional states that could be predicted based on wolves' facial movements with 71 per cent accuracy. However, the accuracy dropped to only 65 per cent for domestic dogs across different breeds

The researchers identified nine distinct emotional states - including anger, anxiety, curiosity, fear, friendliness, happiness, interest, joy and surprise - that could be predicted based on wolves' facial movements with 71 per cent accuracy.

However, the accuracy dropped to only 65 per cent for domestic dogs across different breeds.

The confusion was especially high between positive states like friendliness and negative states like fear.

The researchers suggest that the varying facial structures resulting from selective breeding, such as shorter muzzles, floppy ears, pendulous lips and excessive wrinkling, have limited dogs' ability to produce the same range of facial expressions as their wolf ancestors.

In facts, dogs that had short, broad skulls, floppy or semi-floppy ears or hanging lips were linked to nearly 80 per cent of the cases where a dog's facial expression did not match the perceived emotional state.

According to the authors, this confusion between positive and negative states could be detrimental for dog-human interactions and even pose safety risks if humans misinterpret fearful or aggressive behaviour in dogs as friendliness.

They suggest domestic dogs may compensate for limited facial expressions by vocalising more than wolves during social interactions.

Researchers suggest varying facial structures resulting from selective breeding, such as shorter muzzles, floppy ears, pendulous lips and excessive wrinkling, have limited dogs' ability to produce the same range of facial expressions as their wolf ancestors

Researchers suggest varying facial structures resulting from selective breeding, such as shorter muzzles, floppy ears, pendulous lips and excessive wrinkling, have limited dogs' ability to produce the same range of facial expressions as their wolf ancestors

Lead author Elana Hobkirk, from the university's Department of Biosciences, said: 'This study demonstrates how important it is to be able to observe fine details in behaviour, and how such observations have allowed us to see just how communicatively complex and sentient wolves are and how domestication may be affecting our social bonds with our companion dogs.'

Co-author Dr Sean Twiss said: 'Our research team focuses on individual differences in animal behaviour, and Elana's work adds an exciting new dimension to this, revealing how individuals differ in their abilities to convey their emotional states, and what that might imply for successful communication - or not - within social groups, including humans and their dogs.'

The findings were published in the journal Scientific Reports.

Comments