Your daily adult tube feed all in one place!
Former President Donald Trump is preparing to launch a $100 million lawsuit accusing Attorney General G Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray of running a 'malicious prosecution' against him.
It comes two years after the 2022 of Trump's Mar-a-Lago home that yielded a trove of 300 documents marked 'classified'.
Trump-appointed Judge Aileen Cannon subsequently dismissed a case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against the former president.
The new lawsuit, prepared by Trump lawyer Daniel Epstein, claims a 'clear intent to engage in political persecution' against Trump.
It says the search, which occurred while Trump was away, came from actions 'rooted in intrusion upon seclusion, malicious prosecution, and abuse of process.'
The actions of the DOJ and FBI are 'inconsistent with protocols requiring the consent of an investigative target, disclosure to that individual’s attorneys, and the use of the local U.S. Attorney’s Office,' Epstein writes in the document obtained by Fox News.
Former President Donald Trump is suing the Justice Department for $100 million, claiming a 'clear intent to engage in political persecution'
Trump has personal inveighed against the search for years, even while battling Smith inside a federal courthouse in Florida.
The former president has a history of filing headline-grabbing lawsuits that help underline his political points.
Last year, a judge dismissed his $100 million lawsuit against the New York Times and his niece Mary Trump.
Trump has long accused President Joe Biden of driving 'witch hunt' probes against him, and his latest suit identifies both Garland, a Biden nominee, and Wray, a Trump nominee.
The suit says the government should have negotiated with Trump rather than searching his residence, although the National Archives had engaged in in back-and-forth with Trump lawyers for months over the location of materials moved from the White House during his final weeks in office.
'Garland and Wray should have never approved a raid and subsequent indictment of President Trump because the well-established protocol with former U.S. presidents is to use non-enforcement means to obtain records of the United States,' Epstein writes.
'But notwithstanding the fact that the raid should have never occurred, Garland and Wray should have ensured their agents sought consent from President Trump, notified his lawyers, and sought cooperation,' the suit continues.
Trump has long fumed about the FBI's August 2022 raid on Mar-a-Lago
The FBI uncovered a trove of boxes containing materials marked 'classified' at the Florida club
The White House and DOJ have long denied that politics drove the probe. Smith, who was appointed by Garland to oversee the case, defended the indictment last summer after it was handed down by a grand jury amid accusations of political interference.
'We have one set of laws in this country and they apply to everyone,' he said. 'Adhering to and applying the laws is what determines the outcome of an investigation. Nothing more, nothing less.'
The suit comes in the heat of a political campaign where Trump has complained about being forced to mount a new campaign against Vice President Kamala Harris, after Biden stepped back from his campaign amid a Democratic pressure effort.
Cannon's ruling, which followed Trump's argument that Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, prompted an appeal by Smith's team of prosecutors. It sidelined the case that was once thought to be the most politically perilous for Trump of the four criminal cases he was facing before the November elections.
Smith last week filed for an extension in the January 6 case being tried in Washington, D.C., which has also delayed by a Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity.
'What President Trump is doing here is not just standing up for himself – he is standing up for all Americans who believe in the rule of law and believe that you should hold the government accountable when it wrongs you,' Epstein told Fox.
During the Florida case, Trump's team did not succeed in getting Judge Cannon to toss out the evidence seized, although it did persuade her to appoint a special master to pour over the materials, which had the effect of delaying the case.